Обговорення користувача:INeverCry/Archive 1

Archive 1

Autopatrolled

Hi, you have been granted autopatrolled status per your request. Best regards, — NickK (обг.) 23:10, 18 вересня 2013 (UTC)

thank you for your contributions (both done and planned). enjoy yourself and work hard ;) --アンタナナ 23:11, 18 вересня 2013 (UTC)

Thanks again for helping me with this. INeverCry 01:25, 19 вересня 2013 (UTC)

ред. № 14608082

hello! is everything okay? just wondering --アンタナナ 00:39, 31 липня 2014 (UTC)

Yo.

You obviously speak English. Alas I'd like to take this oppurtunity to say that yes, you are in fact a bully. I contributed on the commons and have every right to be as annoyed as I am. You blocked me. For NO VALID REASON. That is unfair and yes I am annoyed. Again, you had no reason to do so. Get off your high horse and if people want to contribute, let them do so. I had done absolutely NOTHING WRONG. I'd appreciate an email as to why on the following address : tom.june13@gmail.com as again I'm annoyed. I don't understand why Wikipedia has just become a playground for a privileged few to run around and treat others in any way they please. I thought the whole idea of Wikipedia was that it is for everyone. Not for a select few. I'm really rather annoyed. And am sorry for being so rude. I had a stroke recently and it has played havoc with my emotions. No excuse I know, but IU am sorry, I'm just annoyed at let down. 92.24.46.200 19:29, 10 серпня 2016 (UTC)

I have nothing against you personally. I'm sure you're a decent guy. My blocks on Commons are a formality based on the global lock of your account by M7: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/LouisPhilippeCharles. As an admin, the Commons community trusts me to apply blocks impartially. I block any sockpuppet that I become aware of, no matter who it is. I can't treat you differently than other blocked/locked users, as that would be unfair to the Commons community who expect me to be unbiased and consistent. Locked users aren't allowed to edit any WMF projects with alternate accounts or with IPs. I'm simply enforcing policy. Again, this is no judgement against you or dislike of you. I understand you feel frustrated and bothered at not being able to contribute as a regular editor, and I sympathize with you. Your best way of getting your editing privileges back is to quit creating new accounts or editing with IPs for a 3 or 6 month period (especially edits where you call anyone a moron or wanker), and then appeal your global lock at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Global. Each sock or IP you use to evade that lock makes your case worse, especially if you personally attack people like myself or Courcelles. If you were to go 6 months with no sock/IP editing and no messages like the above, I would personally support lifting the lock/ban on your main account and allowing you to edit with that or an agreed upon alternate. INeverCry 23:05, 10 серпня 2016 (UTC)

Yes. I'm more than aware I can't ber treated like a human being. I'm more than aware that I can't be treated as a human being now. Basically, the account I set up (the one I requested a move of an image of the Count of Clermont) was only set up to upload a coat of arms I had made, but obviously didn't get a chance to. I had that ripped away from me. If I was unblocked with your influence, how would that go about? Would I have to set up another account? Would you mind giving me your email address at all? As I have not added this talkj page to my bookmarks, it won't let me for some reason. My address is above but I'll put it again for easy reference tom.june13@gmail.com Lastly, I genuinely am sorry for being so rude, I had a brain injury and that has made my emotions just go off the chart. No excuse I know but there is a reason. So sorry again.  :(

In all honesty, getting a global lock removed that was put in place because of vandalism, and followed by long-term sock account creation is difficult, if not impossible. You would have to go 6 months or even a year or more with no socking or IP editing, and then appeal the lock at Meta. I could put in a support, but it would be up to the stewards in the end. Try not to take this too personally. One of the WMF's worst vandals, JarlaxleArtemis, was also banned for page-moving vandalism. We still have filters to prevent rapid page moving. INeverCry 07:10, 12 серпня 2016 (UTC)

Greetings! Sorry for the late reply I had to sift through my browsing history which takes ages. And now I shall again ask for your email address as that was exhausting [lol]. Also are you referring to being unblocked on the commons or on Wikipedia as a whole? I'm confused now. My last point is probably the most irritating. This sockpuppet stuff is unfair not to mention tedious. There is an admin on the English Wiki by the name of Favonian who seems to block/label any person he seems to dislike as being me/LPC. Which in itself is unfair. Just because he/she does not agree With the way someone else edits, that does not give him/her the right to automatically accuse that account of being a "sockpuppet" of me/LPC. I've even looked on there edit history and seen this myself. It honestly makes my blood boil. Not only is it juvenile but it is spiteful. My issue with several pages on the English Wiki generally regards people's names and titles. For example, there is one Louise Élisabeth de Bourbon (which I in fact made several years ago now) and she is named on her page as Louise Élisabeth de Bourbon-Condé. This is incorrect (not to mention stupid and misleading, and surely goes against the concept of Wikipedia, which is supposed to show the correct information?). I even uploaded her signature to the commons to prove my point. Yet that is ignored. And again, I have seen Favonian label several Ips on English Wiki as being me and 90% of them have nothing to do with me (They often include football stuff, Which I could not care less about) That is unfair. I made at least 350/400 articles on Wikipedia and uploaded dozens of images but those huge contributions are just glossed over and totally ignored. Now can I have your email; address now? :O Even then I would not consider myself a vandal at all. A vandal blanks the page. A vandal puts in stupid links. A vandal redirects pages to curse words. I have never done nor have any intention of doing such things. I've corrected things that need correcting. 92.24.46.206 18:31, 13 серпня 2016 (UTC)

I don't edit en.wiki much anymore myself. I resigned as an administrator there after an unblock I did was turned into a huge issue and I was taken to Arbcom. It was very unpleasant. I also have no familiarity with your case beyond the few socks I've blocked on Commons. Anyways, you mention a Commons account. You might be able to appeal for a Commons-only account, but, again, you'd have to cease all sock account creation for a while to show Commons administrators you can contribute without problems. After 6 months or a year you could post an appeal via IP on the administrators noticeboard asking to create a clearly marked account. But if you continued editing on other sites, any accounts you create or IPs you use would continue to be blocked or locked, and Commons admins would take that into account. As for my email, I don't give that out publicly. I've dealt with a lot of nasty people as an administrator and formerly as a checkuser, and I wouldn't want any of them to see my email address and harass me. INeverCry 20:52, 13 серпня 2016 (UTC)

Protection

@NickK:, @Antanana: could you please protect my talk for 6 months or a year? The IP editor that continues to stalk me is globally locked LTA sockmaster LouisPhilippeCharles. He'll be around for a long time (he's already been socking for 5+ years). Thanks guys. lNeverCry 20:25, 8 жовтня 2016 (UTC)

Так Зроблено — NickK (обг.) 22:03, 8 жовтня 2016 (UTC)